Fast Food Thinking Won’t Fix Slow Soil Problems

Oct 22, 2025 | Education, Culture and Soil Stewardship

We live in a world that craves speed. We expect food in minutes, messages in seconds, and results overnight. But when it comes to soil, this mindset collides with reality. Soil does not work on fast-food timelines.

It takes centuries to form just a thin layer of soil, while human activity can destroy it in a single season.

The urgency of climate change and food security tempts us to quick fixes. But soil doesn’t bend to impatience. If we want a fertile future, we must learn to work with soil’s pace, not against it.

Soil as a Living Partner

Agriculture has often been designed with people at the centre – yield, profit, and efficiency. Yet farming has never been just about humans. Soil organisms, pollinators, water cycles, and trees are all partners in the system. They are not silent, but actively shape the land every day.

Soils filter water, cycle nutrients, and host millions of organisms in a handful. These processes build resilience, but they unfold slowly. Ignoring this reality is like asking an oak tree to grow as fast as a weed.

The Speed Paradox

Every year, the world loses an estimated 24 billion tonnes of fertile soil through erosion. To put that into perspective: forming just one inch of topsoil can take 500 years under natural conditions.

We are losing soil at a rate far faster than nature can replenish it.

This is the paradox: we need soils to regenerate quickly, but natural processes are inherently slow. Composting, mulching, or cover cropping can help, but they are not an overnight solution; they still take years to restore health. New innovations, such as biochar, microbial inoculants, nano-fertilisers, and crushed rock dust, offer ways to improve soil condition, yet they still don’t work overnight, but their impact is uneven, varying by soil type, climate, and temporality.

Why Fast Fixes Fall Short

It’s tempting to believe technology alone will save us. But soil is not a machine. It cannot be rebooted or patched instantly. Quick fixes often ignore the complexity of soils as living systems. For example:

      • Heavy fertiliser use may deliver fast yield gains, but it strips away long-term resilience.
      • Irrigation may boost crops now, but without robust soil structure, it drains aquifers and leaves the land weaker.

Like fast food, these shortcuts give a short burst of satisfaction but leave deeper problems behind.

Designing With Soil in Mind

The challenge isn’t just technological-it’s about how we design agriculture.

For too long, soil has been treated as a passive background.

In reality, it is an active partner with its own pace. We cannot force soil to heal overnight, but we can create conditions that let it heal faster and stronger. A researcher once said that many organisms can live in the soil, we just have to create favourable conditions. To achieve soil security, we need:

  • Financing the transition: making soil-friendly practices affordable through incentives and payments for ecosystem services.
  • Policy as an accelerator: shifting subsidies from extraction to regeneration.
  • Knowledge networks: spreading practical restoration methods farmer-to-farmer, region-to-region.

This isn’t about slowing down human progress. It’s about aligning our systems with the rhythms of the soil that sustains us.

The Honest Answer

Can we make soil generation faster? The honest answer is: not yet, not everywhere, not at the scale we need. We know how to improve condition in many places, but we don’t yet know how to regenerate soil rapidly in all conditions, with reliable adoption across billions of hectares.

The biggest barrier isn’t just science-it’s economics, politics, and patience. Until we align all three, soils will continue to degrade at a faster rate than they can recover.

 

Conclusion: Slow Soil, Important Future

Fast food thinking won’t fix slow soil problems. The timelines may be mismatched, but the solution is not to give up-it is to act smarter and sooner. Every year we wait, the gap widens.

So, the real question is not whether soil can regenerate. It’s whether we can bring together the resources, innovation, and determination to help it recover fast enough to meet the crises of our time.

Because while soil may move slowly, our response cannot.

Credit Photo: Budiman Minasny. Budiman Minasny contributed to this article through his review.
Alex McBratney

by Anilkumar Hunakunti

PhD Candidate at the University of Sydney

Anilkumar is a PhD student at the Sydney Institute of Agriculture, The University of Sydney. He previously worked at the International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT) in India. His research focuses on understanding soil degradation and guiding soil restoration through conceptual and analytical approaches, exploring how energy and carbon regulate the sustainability of soils and their connections with other ecosystems. His work takes a multidisciplinary approach, combining sustainability analysis, modelling, mechanistic approaches, and satellite-based remote sensing using both optical and microwave sensors.

Related Articles

Beyond Yield: Refining the Focus of Modern Agriculture

Beyond Yield: Refining the Focus of Modern Agriculture

For decades, agriculture was judged by one single metric: yield. How much could you grow? How many tonnes per hectare can you obtain? Farmers, researchers, and governments focused on pushing that number higher and higher. This relentless focus on production worked...

read more